Previous Entry | Next Entry

The Mark McKnight Quartet

  • Nov. 6th, 2009 at 1:10 PM
bass dials
The Mark McKnight Organ Quartet
Rectial Room, City Halls
Thursday 5th November 2009

In the end, I decided to go to the Mark McKnight gig, partially swayed by the second comment on my previous post! Since it was Guy Fawkes Night, I was going to get the train - the display on Glasgow Green was likely to create parking issues - but I took the car in the end. I got parked OK, albeit in the most expensive and badly designed multi-storey in Glasgow (Q-Park, Candleriggs). I tried to get into three different spaces before I found one I could actually manoeuvre into - you need a Smart car in there!

Anyway, I was in enough time to get a ticket and wander round the corner for 10min to watch the biggest of the fireworks from Glasgow Green over the buildings - shiny!

The gig was not that busy, since it was bonfire night and there was a Celtic game on too, but the smallish selection of seating was about 3/4 full. A mixed audience - some lone older guys, a handful of students, a handful of professional musicians and some randoms like myself.

The quartet consisted of Mark McKnight on guitar, Will Vinson on alto, James Maddren on drums and Ross Stanley on Hammond organ. The set was a mix of Mark McKnight's originals and some standards.

Acoustically, the room has a lot of reverberation, even more so when it's not so full. For loud bands, this is bad, but for this small group it was actually beneficial to my ear. It lent a wonderful smoothness to the sound - combined with the beautiful tone quality of the sax and guitar in particular, the band sounded rather like a cube with rounded edges. In my head, anyway...

Did I mention the tone quality? *g* Yeah, one of the nicest alto sounds I've heard. At some points I wasn't really listening to the notes, just the tone! Same for the guitar - don't know if it's the guitar, the technique or the amp (or some combination of all three) that produces that sort of clean jazz tone, but I wish I knew and could translate it to bass!

The organ added a nice sound too - I'm more used to hearing Hammond organs in funkier music, rather than straight ahead jazz, so it was a bit unusual for me. But it was nice. My favourite parts of the gig were the couple of bits where the band dropped away and the organ was left playing very quiet, interesting harmonies, and playing about with the sounds and effects it has available. I particularly liked the intro to Bewitched, Bothered and Bewildered. He was also taking on the role of the bass throughout, playing walking bass lines on the left hand. That must be awfully difficult to coordinate with what the right hand is doing, especially when improvising!

On exiting the gig, I passed The Beer Cafe next door where the Michael Dean's Quartet were playing, and it was a lot busier and livelier, but then, it was free and in a a pub! Plus, they'll have benefited from the passing trade of people leaving the fireworks display. An interesting contrast, nonetheless.

Here is a review from Byas'd Opinion, and here is one from Rob Adams at The Herald.

I wonder how the Portico Quartet gig at the Arches was. Rob Adams at the Herald certainly wasn't impressed by them at their Edinburgh gig on the 4th... But John Walters at The Guardian was more appreciative of their London gig. See [info]doughnutdiary's thoughts on the Glasgow gig in the comments for this post.

Comments

( 3 comments — Comment )
[info]doughnutdiary wrote:
Nov. 6th, 2009 05:27 pm (UTC)
Portico Quartet @ the Arches report! I have to say I quite enjoyed it - I didn't really know much about them beforehand to be honest, as it was the Bloke's pick and he already has a couple of their CDs. I won't claim enough knowledge of jazz to provide an in-depth critique, but I quite like a bit of random, fusion-esque meandering, which is pretty much what they do. It reminded me of a strange cross of the freaky jazz bits on 'Solid Air combined with some of the later and lengthier Steely Dan solos. However, a lot of the time the noise of the band was competing with (and often losing out to) the noise of people chatting, and I don't know if this is a criticism to level at their sound guy, the venue, or a strangely uninterested section of the audience who weren't even bothering to lower their voices or direct their conversation into their partners' ears. While generally it was a very pleasant, mellow gig, to be honest you'd have probably got more audio satisfaction from a CD at home.
[info]euphbass wrote:
Nov. 6th, 2009 05:35 pm (UTC)
I'm surprised they were competing with the conversation level - I expected the Arches to be pretty loud in terms of gigs! Which bit was it in? I've only been to a wee bit at the back with arched roofs in a cross pattern, and we had to go in the back door, from a side alley, rather than the main entrance.

I listened to some of their stuff on Myspace recently and found it a quite pleasant, somewhat relaxing and repetitive (in a good way)! Perhaps I'll see them another time.

I'm still not sure which was the better gig to choose!
(Anonymous) wrote:
Nov. 8th, 2009 11:01 am (UTC)
Hi. You always manage to get your reviews up before I do. I enjoyed it a lot: http://byased.wordpress.com/2009/11/08/mark-mcknight-organ-quartet-featuring-will-vinson/ (I was one of the "lone older guys").

Q. How many bass players does it take to change a lightbulb?
A. Get the clown on organ to do THAT with his feet!

Byased.
( 3 comments — Comment )

Profile

bass dials
[info]euphbass
euphbass

Page Summary

Links

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Katy Towell